I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama’s eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has release a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer’s arguments.
More From Alan Keyes is Loyal to Liberty
- Obama Threatens Keyes and other Eligibility Plaintiffs
- Challenge to Debate Obama Eligibility Issue
- Loyal To Liberty TV
Related posts:
![Recommend [loyaltoliberty]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/arkayne-media/img/badge/logo-recommend-badge-medium.png){kind=icon}
{ 65 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
MaryAnnH – I find it ironic that you warn me about the risk of being sued for libel, slander, and defamation for my factual comments regarding Dr. Taitz while accepting, without proof, her lies, slander, libel, and defamation of Obama, Judge Land, and others.
I don't know why you'd pretend that the Kenyan "birth certificates" submitted by Dr. Taitz have not been debunked. Search Bomford certificate….As to Lucas Smith…he's a convicted forger and the videos that he alleges were taken in Kenya seem to be made in the Dominican Republic. BTW, he didn't spell the physican's name correctly on his forgery.
39 SSN's all connected with Obama? The McCain and Clinton campaign just let that slide, eh? As my granddaughter would say, "Get real".
Charles Lincoln, Dr. Taitz's "clerk".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20971586/Charles-Lincoln-III-Disbarment-FL-Sup-Ct-2003-FALSE-SSN-Felony
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20971590/Charles-Lincoln-III-Disbarment-CA-State-Bar-Court-State-Bar-Court-2003-FALSE-SSN-Felony
Ambassador Keyes has nothing to worry about in regard to my public comments on this blog. He should be concerned about the lies told by his lawyer and well meaning supporters, on his behalf.
"How do you know the Kenyan BCs are fakes? How do you know that the list of SSN numbers are false? Do you have concrete proof? If so, produce it." (Mary Ann)
You're right Mary Ann. We don't know if the Kenyan birth certificates and the list of social security numbers are fake or legitimate. We just don't know.
So, as for me, I'll say this – when a Court accepts that evidence as being legitimate, then I will too.
"Assault on our first amendment rights to criticize idiot judges, such as Federal judge Robertson in DC. This judge doesn't believe in the rule of law and rule of evidence."
"Every decent American should demand removing this judge of the bench immediately. He is a disgrace for the legal profession."
(Dr. Orly Taitz)
Defamation? Indeed. But not on my part.
"Why am I criticizing Dr. Taitz? I respect Ambassador Keyes and view him as true conservative." (Pocket Rocket)
IF you respect Ambassador Keyes as much as you say, you'd quit slamming his attorney in a public forum.
"I guess what Judge Land had to say qualifies as defamation as well." (Derek P.)
No, Judge Land is just stupid–and I hope he has to eat his $20,000 sanction, along with his robe!
Pocket Rocket said: "Dr. Taitz has submitted fake documents as evidence. She has made contradictory statements and blatant false claims in court and in the media." (by pocketrocketbug)
Derek P. said: "Dr. Taitz has submitted fake documents as evidence." (pocketrocketbug)
To support the allegations that have been made, that is (apparently) the only course of action that is available. False discovery." (by Derek P.)
If either of you have any hard evidence for your claims, I suggest you produce it or shut up. I'm not talking about all the petty things of which you harang, I am talking about making public accusations regarding what would is considered bases for libel, slander and defamation of character.
Your petty whines about typing mistakes and minor procedural mistakes are a matter of personal perception. Those mistakes (made by other attorneys in every jurisdiction) are nothing to get excited about.
Pocket Rocket said: "You can easily find the fake Kenyan birth certificates, the list of SSN numbers falsely attributed to Obama, etc."
How do you know the Kenyan BCs are fakes? How do you know that the list of SSN numbers are false? Do you have concrete proof? If so, produce it. Otherwise, shut up before you find yourself enmeshed in a lawsuit yourself.
"To DerekP & PocketRocket: I suggest that you have verifiable, documented evidence of the allegation you make, for what you say qualifies as defamation. If you have proof, bring it on and enlighten us all. If not, then I suggest you keep silent until such proof is obtained." (MaryAnnH)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20996403/Gov-uscourts-gamd-77605-28-0
I guess what Judge Land had to say qualifies as defamation as well.
Chiu Chunling – "If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?"
Lewis Carroll
MaryAnnH – Are you disputing any of the factual (not opinion) allegations that I've made about Dr. Taitz's conduct?
Court Documents involving Dr. Orly Taitz – You can easily find the fake Kenyan birth certificates, the list of SSN numbers falsely attributed to Obama, etc. She submits them in most of her filings.
http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/8640993-jack-ryan
Dr. Taitz website – She's quite open in making comments about Judge Land, Judge Carter, etc.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Chiu Chunling, I read your comments with interest each time I come across them. For an evil person (tongue in cheek), you are a really nice person…and reasoned, updated on the issues, and you know your Constitution pretty well. You also know your "circle of authority," those things which are within your power to change, and those things which are not.
PocketRocket, on the other hand, has no clear idea of his circle of authority. Whom Dr. Keyes chooses to represent his legal interests is entirely up to him, and him alone. It doesn't matter how bad you think Orly Taitz is, or how incompetent, replacing her is NOT your decision. If you really want to advise Dr. Keyes in this area, it would be better done in private, not in a public forum such as this one.
My opinion is that, with the exception of a few hiccups, Barnett vs. Obama has been prosecuted in an adequate manner. If you are so sure that you could do better, perhaps you should volunteer your time doing legal research to help.
To DerekP & PocketRocket: I suggest that you have verifiable, documented evidence of the allegation you make, for what you say qualifies as defamation. If you have proof, bring it on and enlighten us all. If not, then I suggest you keep silent until such proof is obtained.
I do not pray for Obama. I can imagine praying that he be a good President, but I do not, as faith is an essential component of prayer. It would be like praying for it to rain lollipops…except I might actually decide to pray for something like that. As far as I have been able to determine, he has nothing to do with me, and I nothing to do with him. He is outside of my jurisdiction, so to speak.
I don't even pray that he'll be removed from office, though of course I do occasionally pray that those who seek to preserve the Constitution will be strengthened and protected. Maybe I shouldn't be mentioning that here…learning that evil persons pray for you may not be the most confidence building experience. Still, one aspect of my evil is that I so rarely let considerations of what I should do affect what I actually do.
It's not like I'm deliberately picking evil…that's just what happens sometimes when you don't choose good. Go figure.
"Dr. Taitz has submitted fake documents as evidence." (pocketrocketbug)
To support the allegations that have been made, that is (apparently) the only course of action that is available. False discovery.
MaryAnnH – A "legal professional" should be able to understand the difficulty that plaintiffs are facing in trying to have a US court determine that the President of the United States is ineligible to hold office. If you wish to assert that issues related to jurisdiction, standing, justicability, proper venue, and the political question doctrine constitute "spurious grounds", I'd like to see your detailed legal opinion, with case law supporting your claims.
Why am I criticizing Dr. Taitz? I respect Ambassador Keyes and view him as true conservative.
I have had growing concerns about the conduct of Dr. Taitz, as Ambassador Keyes attorney, and in regard to her statements and actions in other eligibility cases. Dr. Taitz has submitted fake documents as evidence. She has made contradictory statements and blatant false claims in court and in the media. She has failed to file documents correctly or in a timely manner. She has made allegations that federal judges have engaged in criminal conduct. Her court clerk, Mr. Lincoln, is a disbarred lawyer. How much evidence do you need before you develop a clear opinion about an attorney's competance and performance?
I support and defend our US Constitution. Obama is the President of the United States. If he engaged in fraud and is ineligible for this office, he must be impeached by the House of Representatives and convicted by the Senate.
Alternatively, an interested party could test quo warranto in the DC District Court, without assistance of the Attorney General (Holder). There is some doubt as to whether this applies to the office of the President of the United States. The case would need to go to SCOTUS.
http://michie.lexisnexis.com/dc/lpext.dll/dccode/10726/113cb/12677/1267c/1268a?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm&2.0
As to the level of power and evil of the man in the White House, I see no evidence that it's any more or less than it has been in decades. I pray for this President.
http://www.findthepower.com/PageOne/SiteStartPrayerForOurPresident.htm
POCKET ROCKET: Regarding "painful strings" … what is YOUR explanation for the various courts summarily dismissing the many lawsuits that have been filed thus far? Especially on such spurious grounds? I don't think you appreciate the power and evil of the current resident of the people's White House.
As for your Orly quote…did you read the last sentence? "We might need to ask for clarification, but at FIRST GLANCE it looks like a go." I believe I have discussed the Barnett v. Obama lawsuit to the greatest extent that I can without giving the opposition a strategy to oppose us.
I was wrong about the summary judgment deadlines…they were mentioned in a prior minute order, I believe perhaps 09-08-09…I do not have the docket sheet in front of me at this moment. I believe it is unfortunate that Judge Carter made those tentative dates final (ECF maintenance was finished late Saturday, and I got in early on Sunday). I also believe it is unfortunate that Judge Carter so quickly denied Orly's request for relief from stay. Those are my opinions, nothing more, nothing less.
May I ask what your purpose is in pointing out Orly's errors? Is this constructive criticism? Just curious.
MaryAnnH – Dr. Taitz did misinterpret Judge Carter's order. I don't see how you spin it otherwise.
Here's what she posted on her blog.
"Looks like it’s a go with the eligibility trial"
"I just got an order from judge Carter. He does not say outright that the motion to dismiss, but he says that the dates for trial are final. We might need to ask for the clarification, but from the first glance it looks like a go."
Dr. Orly Taitz
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?cat=8&paged=2
Updated Link to Judge Carter's ruling
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20844640/KEYES-BARNETT-83-MINUTES-IN-CHAMBERS-ORDER-by-Judge-David-O-Carter-DENYING-EX-PARTE-MOTION-FOR-RELIEF-FROM-STAY-OF-DISCOVERY-82-The-Ex-Part
BTW, suggesting that someone may pull very painful strings to get Judge Carter to change his opinion, is to accuse Judge Carter of judicial misconduct if he fails to report such attempts or responds to them.
I think so many are forgetting that even if the cirtificate showes he was born in Hawaii, that it is the president being set that people "the entire public must vet a man that the coursts had previously stated we could not view his vital and college information!
And that is not right!
Keep going!
POCKET ROCKET: I attempted to access the link you provided. This is the message I received:
"The document 'KEYES|BARNETT v OBAMA – 83 – MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING EX PARTE' has been deleted"
← Previous Comments