The threat to America’s way of life- How I believe we’ll thwart the whole thing

by loyaltoliberty on September 15, 2012

[This is a comment and reply occasioned by the article Will Americans vote from fear or bravely to conserve what they love?]

THE COMMENT

Odd timing to abandon the GOP, when the TEA Party influence is on the rise and the Socialist Liars Party hates God. I think you guys are closet Obama supporters. Don’t you realize we have to gain control of both houses of Congress or America is over? Do you not see the existential threat to our way of life?

MY REPLY

It’s ironic that , having years ago and ever since laid everything I have on the line to warn people of the existential threat Obama poses to America, I should have to endure the slings and arrows of uninformed innuendo.  Thanks to my experience I have some first hand knowledge of which of Obama’s foes fought him on grounds of truth and principle all along, and which of them actually tolerated, or even aided and abetted him in his rise to power, though they strike a pose of opposition now because it serves their political ambitions.  I know therefore that Obama is just part of the existential threat, which comes from the whole left-turning elitist faction that presently controls both political parties. If we fight one wing while the other triumphs unconditionally with our support, we only help America to succumb to the existential threat. To save our country, we must see and deal with the whole threat, not given in to an elitist constructed scenario that uses us to carry it out.  So, if you take the time to read what I have written about the “Platform Republican” Strategy you should realize  that it does not encourage conservative voters to abandon the GOP, YET.  It involves rejecting a GOP candidate who epitomizes what’s wrong with the GOP (conservative rhetoric masking actions that surrender to or even promote socialism, the destruction of the Constitution, fiscal suicide (runaway debt and deficits), etc.), while voting, to the extent conscience permits, for the rest of the GOP ticket.  The aim is to demonstrate dramatically the solid strength of the conservative voter base by giving those who presumably support the GOP platform a solid conservative “yes” (despite the Platform’s imperfections) with a majority that noticeably exceeds what Romney gets. (BTW, the “Platform Republican” approach gives disaffected conservatives a reason to go to the polls.  They can express their disaffection by refusing to vote for Romney.  But by encouraging them to vote for the rest of the GOP ticket, the “Platform Republican” approach actually increases the likelihood of GOP majorities in both the Senate and the House.  It will of course interfere with any elitist faction efforts to claim that such victories result from Romney’s “coattails”.  The result strengthens the conservative ability to battle socialism even if and when Romney is the one pushing for it, (as he did as governor of Massachusetts.  You knew that, yes?)

Given the track record of the Boehner led House, this way of voting is not a vote of confidence in the GOP leadership.  It’s a message conveying the strength of the conservative base, with the clear implication that if the GOP surrender to socialism, etc. continues, conservatives have the voting strength and the independent political will to stand apart from BOTH wings of the left-turning elitist faction (Obama Democrat or Romney Republican) and achieve political victory on their own.

This demonstration of strength and resolve may or may not influence the behavior of the elitist GOP leaders.  It probably won’t, since their post-2010 behavior has already demonstrated that they don’t take their marching orders from grassroots people.  But too many grassroots conservatives lack confidence in their own strength.  They are accepting the “no choice but the GOP” road to conservative self-extinction.  The “Platform Republican” approach lets them give in to this weakness one more time, but in a way that should greatly increase their ability thereafter to trust in their own independent strength.  The only way to prove that strength TO THEMSELVES is by refusing to vote for a GOP candidate who is a false-flag conservative, whose record of action consistently contradicts his conservative lip-service.  Once they do, the conservative  threat to “hold the GOP’s feet to the fire” will be backed by a credible demonstration that conservatives have the independence in thought and action needed to respond to more GOP betrayal by striking out on our own.  On the other hand, without proving such independence a Romney victory will simply verify that the elitist faction can stampede conservatives at will into supporting whatever sham conservatives they serve up.  This will make the GOP’s elitist leaders impervious to “paper tiger” conservative political outrage that routinely burns itself out without damage to their agenda of control.  Why should the left-turning, America-compromising GOP elitists fear a fire whose heat they can routinely channel and control as they please?

[WILL YOU SAY NO TO OBAMA? WILL YOU SAY NO TO ROMNEY? WILL YOU SAY NO TO SOCIALISM, WHATEVER PARTY LABEL IT WEARS? WILL YOU JOIN IN GIVING AN UNMISTAKABLE, VISIBLE POLITICAL MANDATE TO THE GOP'S "PLATFORM REPUBLICANS"? IF YOU WILL CONSIDER THE “PLATFORM REPUBLICAN” VOTER STRATEGY FOR THE 2012 ELECTION, JUST SEND ME AN EMAIL AT ALAN@LOYALTOLIBERTY.COM. PUT "YES I WILL" IN THE SUBJECT LINE. NO FURTHER MESSAGE IS NEEDED. OF COURSE YOUR ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS AND SUGGESTIONS WILL BE WELCOMED. AS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS APPROACH DEVELOPS, I'LL SEND EMAIL UPDATES TO THE REPLY ADDRESS YOU USE. ALSO, PLEASE SHARE THIS IDEA WITH OTHERS SO THEY CAN CONSIDER IT FOR THEMSELVES.]

Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Galatians 4:16)

Plaxo PulseStumbleUponLinkedInFacebookDeliciousShare
  • redneck4Christ

    We are strange allies, Dr. Keyes. You come at this as an idealistic patriot but
    a formal “Christian”. I once had your
    patriotic idealism but am now a formal patriot but an idealistic
    Christian. I see your point about Romney
    and his socialist past but I see something much more alarming – he is an
    opportunist with no true moral compass.
    For Romney is a high-ranking member of a cult founded by an adulterer
    and conman. And because Jesus is my King
    and His Kingdom is not of this world, my vote and anything I do will be done,
    not out of patriotic fervor for the USA but out of obedience to the admonition
    in God’s Word to glorify God in anything I do (1 Cor 10:31). Contrary to what Mormons or Catholics think and
    teach, there is not a man, other than Jesus the Christ, who shares the
    attributes of divinity or infallibility with God. We are His creatures – He (3
    Persons in One Being) is the Creator of all that exists. The 66 books that comprise His Word stand as
    our Supreme and Fully Sufficient Guide for Faith and Life (2 Tim 3:16-17).

    • redneck4Christ

      I just learned of your stand on reparations. This will be my last visit to this blog.
      http://2004.keyesarchives.com/news/040818reparations.php

      • alkeyes

        I trust that what you learned wasn’t based on the disinformation the GOP pro-abortion crowd in Illinois use to help Obama win the U.S. Senate election in 2004? I’d be interested to know exactly what you’re referring to.

        • redneck4Christ

          It was your own archive. I posted the link in my message. The message you replied to. Haven’t we had enough affirmative action? I agree with Thomas Sowell and men like him on this. I can just imagine the 1040. Check here for a free ride on WASP’s if you are black, female, sodomite, Asian, Hispanic, etc…You are proof there are enough opportunities for blacks who want to break out of the chains of government dole.

          • alkeyes

            I still don’t know what your’re talking about. Could you quote the words in which I said I supported reparations?

          • redneck4Christ

            August 18, 2004
            Keyes on reparations for descendants of slaves

            In answer to a question raised by the press August 16, asking if he “supports reparations” for black Americans, Alan Keyes said he felt a tax break for descendants of slaves might be appropriate “in principle.”

            Noting that black slaves “were deprived of any opportunity to build wealth the way people would ordinarily build wealth,” Keyes suggested that tax breaks offered a reasonable solution to the legacy of material disadvantage that continues today among African-Americans of slave heritage.

            Keyes added, “I think a cogent argument could be made for such ‘reparations’ in principle.”

            Tuesday afternoon, Keyes released the following statement, elaborating his position on the reparations issue:

            “I have consistently opposed the effort to extort monetary damages from the American people. As I have argued in the past, the great sacrifices involved in the Civil War represented the requital in blood and treasure for the terrible injustices involved in slavery. In this form the so called ‘reparations’ movement represents an insult to the historic commitment that many Americans made to the end of slavery, which included the sacrifice of their lives.

            “I have also consistently maintained that the history of slavery, racial segregation and discrimination did real damage to black Americans, left real and persistent material wounds in need of healing.

            “In various ways through the generations since the end of slavery, America has tried to address this objective fact, but without real success. This was at least in part the rationale for many elements of the Great Society programs of the sixties, and for the original and proper concept of affirmative action developed under Republican leadership during the Nixon years.

            “Unfortunately, the government-dominated approaches of the Great Society, which purported to heal and repair the legacy of historical damage, actually widened and deepened the wounds. They undermined the moral foundations of the black community and seriously corrupted the family structure and the incentives to work, savings, investment, and business ownership.

            “The idea I have often put forward to address this challenge involves a traditionally Republican, conservative and market-oriented approach: removing the tax burden from the black community for a generation or two in order to encourage business ownership, create jobs and support the development of strong economic foundations for working families.

            “This has the advantage of letting people help themselves, rather than pouring money into government bureaucracies that displace and discourage their own efforts. It takes no money from other citizens, while righting the historic imbalance that results from the truth that black slaves toiled for generations at a tax rate that was effectively 100 percent.

            “I have also made it clear that while I believe that the descendants of slaves would be helped by this period of tax relief, my firm goal and ultimate objective is to replace the income tax, and thereby free all Americans from this insidious form of tax slavery. It is well known that this is one of the key priorities of the Keyes campaign.”

          • alkeyes

            The reason the word ‘reparations’ is in quotes is that the idea has nothing to do with affirmative action or money handouts. It has literally to do with healing undeniable damage, in exactly the way we let our injured bodies heal at times, by giving the damage parts a chance to heal themselves. It simply has to do with people keeping their own hard earned money, and I advocated it as an application of the general policy that I is needed for all Americans- abolition of the income tax. It has nothing to do with the welfare state straw man with which you and others slander me. And you know it! I never understood the motive for this particular slur. Perhaps you could explain it to me?

          • redneck4Christ

            My motive is to heal by moving on rather than doing more of
            the same. At some point, we need to look
            at all the ways black people have been given some kind of “reparation” and call
            it enough. Black people have been given
            money and they have been given opportunity in the form of preferential hiring practices, lowered admission standards,
            racial quotas, etc… And the same goes
            with the Indians.

            Call it what you want but when the law is applied
            differently to people due to race, gender, etc…, that is affirmative action. Our goal should be to reach a place where
            people are hired because of the content of their character rather than the
            color of their skin. I can attest that I
            have hired many people and skin color plays no part in my decision unless some
            quota is involved. If it ever played a
            part, it was back in the days when I was compelled to choose minorities and I
            did as I was told.

            It is pretty pathetic that when I mention your position on
            reparations, you try to wiggle out of it.
            Then when I hold up a mirror by showing you your own words, you cry foul.

            I was considering you as my write-in for President until
            this issue came up, so don’t even try to construe this as some personal attack. Obviously it is our difference of opinion rather than some slanderous purpose that drives my responses.
            And it is also obvious that you are far too quick to make a difference
            of opinion in to a case of slander.

  • God’s Choice

    Dr. Keyes, the solution proposed by you in the Platform Republican approach is so common-sense and SO doable as to have a radical outcome for this election and our nation. That’s the very reason the GOP and Romney(ites) are running scared. They are fearmongers spreading fear like wildfire in hopes that any/all conservatives, constitutionalists and libertarians will cast votes for their man. I WILL NEVER BE A PARTY TO VOTING OR ACTING IN ANY WAY OUT OF FEAR! Neither Mitt Romney nor Barack Obama deserve to be president of the United States of America. I’m believing and praying there are many more like me (and you) who will PRAY to know God’s person of choice, then act by way of a write in vote! Abraham Lincoln won the election just that way. Perhaps that’s what God is waiting for — for us to once again act boldly, courageously, out of the main-stream way of doing things! God bless!

  • God’s Choice

    Dr. Keyes, the solution proposed by you in the Platform Republican approach is so common-sense and SO doable as to have a radical outcome for this election and our nation. That’s the very reason the GOP and Romney(ites) are running scared. They are fearmongers spreading fear like wildfire in hopes that any/all conservatives, constitutionalists and libertarians will cast votes for their man. I WILL NEVER BE A PARTY TO VOTING OR ACTING IN ANY WAY OUT OF FEAR! Neither Mitt Romney nor Barack Obama deserve to be president of the United States of America. I’m believing and praying there are many more like me (and you) who will PRAY to know God’s person of choice, then act by way of a write in vote! Abraham Lincoln won the election just that way. Perhaps that’s what God is waiting for — for us to once again act boldly, courageously, out of the main-stream way of doing things! God bless!

Previous post:

Next post: