Featured Posts

America's real party system-Part 1

[Every now and then something I read produces a critical reaction that impels me to focus on the background historical and other assumptions that I take for granted  in my thinking.  This article is the first in a series that developed as I took note of my reaction to a piece about the significance and possible future of the Tea Party movement.  Labor Day has traditionally marked the formal kick-off of the "campaign season" in American politics.  It seems an appropriate day to publishing a series that aims to help readers think through the political reality veiled by the appearance of the so-called two-party system. ] Not long ago I read an article signed J. R. Dunn that offered a plausible history of the relationship between conservatives and the GOP.  It portrays a party in which the “liberal” tail has usually been  wagging the  “conservative dog”, the exception being the era ...

Read More

America's real party system- Part 3

If, during eras of elite ascendancy, the two most visible parties are tools of elite manipulation, then there is at all times a third party involved in all our political activities.  It is the populist party, normally divided against itself by successful elite manipulation.  In terms of its potential, it is always the majority party.  The notion that “third parties fail” is therefore less an observation of fact than a statement of elite intention. In the past, some pervasive material or moral passion occasionally roused this third party to unify under its own leadership .  In our current circumstances the unifying impulse comes in reaction against the elite itself.  There is a widespread sense that the nation suffers from a general failure of elite leadership (in particular, the failure of both elite manipulated parties),  a failure connected with the elite's cynical, purely self-aggrandizing ambition.  The Obama faction's open contempt for ...

Read More

America's real party system-Part 2

In the years that followed the Lincoln era, the United States faced a new organizational imperative.  As in the post-Jackson era, it involved continental expansion.  But in addition to this there were  the material challenges of accommodating new technology’s rapid transformation of economic life, and the moral challenge of reconstituting the nation’s unity despite the persistent post-traumatic stresses still reverberating from the Civil War. These challenges allowed the elite to regain a leadership position, this time co-opting the populist moral passion of the Lincoln era with ideas of national destiny and administrative reform. The result was  an era of unprecedented elite ascendancy marked off by the two Roosevelts, the Republican, Teddy and the Democrat, FDR.  Their familiar nicknames represent the complete submergence of elite ascendancy in the streams of populist passion.  They signify the virtually complete success of the elite divisional strategy. The two Roosevelts aptly represent this success.  Their family relationship ...

Read More

Is Lakin’s court-martial an American ‘Dreyfus affair’?

I doubt that most people would be shocked to learn that sometimes the influence of power can interfere with and even derail the course of justice in our legal system.  Behind the scenes, a phone call from a powerful politician, or a corporate mogul often affects the actions or judgments of people whose personal ambitions they are in a position to help or hinder.  Usually though, people giving heed to such considerations have enough sense to cloak what they do with words or actions that give their corruption at least the appearance of probity.  Maybe its the tribute that vice renders to virtue.  Maybe its nothing more than self-serving prudence (the mask of honesty that facilitates corruption.) However, when court officers conclude that such hypocrisy is no longer worth the effort, things are pretty far gone.  The video featured with this post  focuses on the recent decision by Col. Denise R. ...

Read More

Planned Parenthood’s moral insanity

Daily Brief #13 The video featured on this page is a news report out of Texas about a pro-life billboard campaign just launched there by the Radiance Foundation and the Life Education Resource Network (L.E.A.R.N.).  It’s an effort to focus attention on the disproportionate number of nascent blacks being murdered in Texas under the rubric of abortion rights. What especially provoked my interest was criticism of the project from a Planned Parenthood spokeswoman quoted in the report.  “This is about trying to interfere with women making private personal decisions and unfortunately and really shockingly, this group has decided to use racism as a wedge issue,” Rochelle Tafolla said. “We think that  is just reprehensible…” So its reprehensible to focus an individual’s attention on the impact her individual action has on her community.  Could there be a more perfect illustration of Planned Parenthood’s moral insanity? In many U.S. communities today local laws encourage or even ...

Read More

Was Jesus a leader?

Daily Brief #12 “Asked who would be considered conservative Christian leaders today- with Graham in his 90s and the recent death of Jerry Falwell – Land said that “leaders are leaders because people follow them.”  So says Richard Land. Every year as we approach the commemoration of Christ’s passion, crucifixion and resurrection the people Jesus has saved recall his triumphal entry into Jerusalem. And the most part of the multitude spread their garments in the way; others cut branches from the trees, and spread them in the way.  And the multitudes that went before him, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest.” Judging by the multitudes that followed him, and the words of Richard Land, in this grand triumphal entry, Jesus was a leader. But after he drove the money lenders from the Temple, confounded the ...

Read More

A Meditation on Glenn Beck’s Divine Mission

[I have been in prayerful thought about the events taking place this weekend under Glenn Beck’s auspices.  He portrays them as the beginning of a Great Revival of faith in America.  People I know and think well of are involved.  Yet I find I cannot ignore the check in my spirit that prevents me from accepting that the events or their sponsor are what he professes them to be.  This posting is an effort to lay out the elements that contribute to my misgivings, insofar as they are susceptible to articulation.  Herein I attempt to share a train of thought and the destination toward which  it points.   Is it the right one? With God’s help, time may tell.] Glenn Beck: “I mean, the one part of culture that I am doing a lot of is faith.  But general faith.  We have got to get back to our churches, our synagogues, our mosques, ...

Read More


Encouragement about the Notre Dame Scandal

August 28, 2009 · 3 comments

This entry is part 6 of 7 in the series The Notre Dame Scandal

Here is my latest WND article Encouragement about the NotreDame Scandal. Take a look, then leave a comment here to let me know what you think.


Series Navigation«The Notre Dame Scandal- A Brief ReportOn the continuing scandal at Notre Dame»
  • Plaxo Pulse
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. On the continuing scandal at Notre Dame
  2. The Notre Dame Scandal- A Brief Report
  3. Meditation on the continuing scandal at the University of Notre Dame
  4. Notre Dame: Promoting the Glamour of Evil
  5. Anne Coulter’s Slyly Dishonorable Mention

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Dawg_em August 31, 2009 at 1:25 pm

Since this article was posted Ted Kennedy has died. It has been reported a certain Archbishop, speaking at the funeral Mass, said Kennedy is in Heaven because throughout his political career he defended the least among us. Now I would never suggest a Mass for Christian burial would be the place to emphasize doctrinal differences. But certainly a neutral tone could have been used. To say he was a champion of the "least of these" is an insult added to the injury caused by the American Genocide.

But if this report is accurate it illustrates the lunacy as practiced by the heirarchy in the US. One has to ask if those words were spoken with a straight face. Talk about scandal. It's bad enough to have the leftists in the Church reinvigorated by this nonsense. But what of those struggling to come to grips with the teachings of the church, or simply wondering about what is taught versus actions that belie supposed unalterable truths? How can anyone take the Church seriously?

The scandal at Notre Dame is a logical devolution of the faith-life of American Catholics. On the one hand abortion is an intrinsic evil subjecting its' participants to grave consequences. Wink, wink. Nod. But it really isn't so important as to be of primary concern to all. Sadly, the leadership of the American Catholic church is failing miserably.

Where does it start? I would hazard to guess money is the defining baseline from which we can see a lack of fortitude. Let's be honest. Just try to find a solid pro-life homily emanating from the pulpit. Even during October, the designated Respect Life month. The reason? Tax exemption. This false premise that the church in America cannot get political. Either due to the threat of government sanction for violating the unconstitutional restrictions in place or fear the collection baskets will not yield the resources necessary to support parish infrastructure. The former exists due to a lack of courage to confront the feds over the (501C3?) tax status and the latter is a lack of faith in a God who will supply us with all our needs.

Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Joe Biden, et al should have been excommunicated long ago. This would have prevented this sacriligious event from occurring in the first place. And it would have sent a strong message to the likes of Jenkins that the church is serious when it comes to the slaughter of His precious little ones.

Until those who speak the words follow them with action they can never expect to be taken seriously. Either the killing of 50 million people is an outrage or it isn't. Quit sending mixed messages. A timid heart in the face of pure evil is a loser every time. It's time to show some love. Love of God. Love of his beautiful creation. And tough love for those who are disobedient children sorely in need of a trip to the wood shed.

Reply

Call Me Mom August 28, 2009 at 10:01 pm

I'm happy that he evinced opposition to this heinous event, but wouldn't that opposition have been better voiced at a time when the event was preventable? Maybe he didn't know about it before hand.

Reply

WingletDriver August 28, 2009 at 3:44 pm

Dr. Keyes,

I agree with your article but think Bishop D'Arcy showed weakness from the beginning. This is his diocese, not Notre Dame's. He is in charge of all of the priests from the diocese, which admittedly many (if not most) of the Notre Dame clerics are not under his direct control. However, he may evict or remove their priestly faculties while they are in his diocese. This is solely at his discretion. He could have sent a powerful message by removing Fr. Jenkins or forcing the Congregation of Holy Cross (Fr. Jenkins' order) to replace him.

Instead, he seems more than willing to debate a priest in public about the unequivocal teaching of the Church. This is a debate that should be held with Protestants in an effort to teach the mind of the Church, not with a subordinate who already knows and obviously doesn't care.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a
video comment.

Previous post:

Next post: