Featured Posts

Was Jesus a leader?

Daily Brief #12 “Asked who would be considered conservative Christian leaders today- with Graham in his 90s and the recent death of Jerry Falwell – Land said that “leaders are leaders because people follow them.”  So says Richard Land. Every year as we approach the commemoration of Christ’s passion, crucifixion and resurrection the people Jesus has saved recall his triumphal entry into Jerusalem. And the most part of the multitude spread their garments in the way; others cut branches from the trees, and spread them in the way.  And the multitudes that went before him, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest.” Judging by the multitudes that followed him, and the words of Richard Land, in this grand triumphal entry, Jesus was a leader. But after he drove the money lenders from the Temple, confounded the ...

Read More

A Meditation on Glenn Beck’s Divine Mission

[I have been in prayerful thought about the events taking place this weekend under Glenn Beck’s auspices.  He portrays them as the beginning of a Great Revival of faith in America.  People I know and think well of are involved.  Yet I find I cannot ignore the check in my spirit that prevents me from accepting that the events or their sponsor are what he professes them to be.  This posting is an effort to lay out the elements that contribute to my misgivings, insofar as they are susceptible to articulation.  Herein I attempt to share a train of thought and the destination toward which  it points.   Is it the right one? With God’s help, time may tell.] Glenn Beck: “I mean, the one part of culture that I am doing a lot of is faith.  But general faith.  We have got to get back to our churches, our synagogues, our mosques, ...

Read More

Glenn Beck's hollow piety

As I expected, my  WND article this week has generated a remarkable reaction from readers, including a number of folks who express dismay at the fact that I (like Joseph Farah) would dare to question the sincerity of Glenn Beck's professions of respect for God just because he belittles the importance of the 'gay marriage' issue. . In answer to one such 'shame on you' email I sent the following response, which I think worth sharing here: Before wishing shame on me, it would repay your time to read what I have written on what the "gay marriage" issue involves.  If after doing so you can still accept Beck's careless disregard for God's priorities, I will still pray that God may open your eyes (as I pray for Glenn Beck). We can't defeat the so-called progressives by accepting their standards and priorities. I made no charges against Beck, as you ...

Read More

Mehlman’s gay revelation outs GOP elite's charade

Reflecting on Ken Mehlman’s revelation that he has been and is a practicing homosexual, I found myself thinking of Penelope, the wife of Homer’s Ulysses.  After the Greek victory over the Trojans, he took the long way home, so long in fact that his family pretty much gave him up for dead.  Penelope found herself besieged by suitors eager to try their hands at usurping Ulysses domain while before his son came of age to challenge them. Still loyal in hope and affection to her husband, Penelope devised the famous strategy by which she put off the day when she would be force to choose among the importunate parasites who had taken up residence in the royal compound.   She undertook to weave a shroud for the funeral of her aged father-in-law Laertes,  vowing to make her decision only after it was completed. Work on the shroud gave her the excuse to hold ...

Read More

Is ‘ruling class’ right for America?

Daily Brief #11 Having sapped the foundations of liberty for several decades, key elitist forces  are completing the emplacement of the economic and political WMD’s with which to overturn government of, by and for the people.  But thanks to the arrogance of the Obama faction, many Americans have awakened to the fact that we are in the midst of an assault against the sovereignty of the people. These Americans are praying, writing, gathering, speaking and organizing to produce what could be one of the most spectacular tidal waves of democratic revulsion this country has ever seen.  This is cause for hope and satisfaction.  But in political battle there are times when a change in language cedes victory to the enemy just as the contest reaches its tipping point. In this respect I’ve noticed that some people who seem sincerely committed to encouraging the rejection of totalitarian elitism are adopting a paradigm that ...

Read More

Does Ground Zero Mosque reveal elitists’ politically preferred religion?

In chemistry a reagent is defined as “a substance used to detect or measure another substance or to convert one substance into another by means of the reaction which it causes.”  With this in mind, the Ground Zero Mosque (GZM) project is turning out to be an effective political reagent.  In their reactions to it America’s political and other public figures are taking stands that reveal their core priorities and motivations. In my last posting I discussed this in regard to Ron Paul’s slashing attack on the GZM’s opponents, among them the families and friends of those murdered in the 9-11 attacks, or who died in the aftermath. Paul’s view of the issue suffers from an understanding of freedom that ignores the fact that a God ordained concept of natural right is the basis for every claim to liberty, including the claim to religious liberty.  Paul is blinded by the idolatry of ...

Read More

Ron Paul is wrong, GZM is not a Muslim right

According to Newsmax “Ron Paul unleashed a lengthy and at times angry statement on his website Friday that supports the rights of Muslims to build what’s become known as the “Ground Zero Mosque.”  As they read about it, I’m sure not a few of his admirers will disagree with him.  But as usual they’ll dismiss it as another aberrant outburst from someone whose views they otherwise applaud. If Newsmax is right about his feelings, though, it makes sense to ask why he feels anger at the people opposing the GZM project.  I think it’s because he accepts the view that “this is all about hate and Islamaphobia.  We now have an epidemic of “sunshine patriots” on both the right and the left who are all for freedom, as long as there’s no controversy and nobody is offended.” It’s clear that Paul sees the issue as a test of the sincerity of one’s ...

Read More


Call Obama bad- It’s the Christian thing to do

April 7, 2010 · 2 comments

An article at Lifenews.com reports that the proposed new constitution for Kenya “would overturn its historic prohibition on abortions. Although the draft contains language advocating the right to life for unborn children, it contains a section with a health exception that essentially opens the nation to unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy for any reason.” The article also reports that the Obama faction’s Ambassador to Kenya “is calling on Kenya’s political leaders to rally the people to pass the referendum.”

That comes as no surprise. As described, the proposed Kenyan constitution exactly corresponds to the Obama faction’s characteristic political tactic- say what people want to hear, but do what is required by your own evil objectives. The article goes on to tell us that “A poll conducted March 21-26 by the polling firm Synovate…shows the citizens of Kenya are overwhelmingly pro-life.… Some 69 percent of Kenya residents are against legalizing abortions while just 9 percent support it. Another 16 percent say it doesn’t matter while 6 percent said they had no opinion.” This also comes as no surprise to me. As part of the team that represented the United States at the International Conference on Population in Mexico City in 1984 I helped negotiate a result that inhibited the use of funds by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for abortion. It would never have occurred without support from pro-life African countries like Kenya.

Now the Obama faction aims to uses the power and prestige of the United States to plant the seed of evil in Kenya’s constitutional framework, against the good will of its people. Thanks to the pragmatic wisdom of Christ, I expect such actions from them. In the very first article ever posted on this blog, I remembered Christ’s instruction: “By their fruits ye shall know them.” Thinking about Obama I reasoned it out this way:

So how can we know that a tree is bad; by judging its fruit in light of God’s word rather than relying on information derived exclusively from our own faculties. Using Obama as an example, one of his fruits appears to be making sure that abortion and infanticide are sanctioned as right and lawful. God’s will for us condemns the taking of innocent human life. Obama’s fruit is contrary to God’s will, and therefore bad. But a good tree cannot bear bad fruit. Therefore Obama is a bad tree. This means that all his fruit is objectively bad; however it may look to us. We cannot cherry pick the fruit of a bad tree once we have determined its objective condition. This puts the lie to the actions of those so-called Christian leaders who think we can support Obama when he does what is good, and oppose him when he does wrong. According to Christ’s criterion, no fruit that he produces can be good. Though it looks good, and may produce what seem to us to be good results, according to Christ’s rule of moral reasoning, his fruit is bad because he is bad.

Does this mean that we jump to the conclusion that someone is bad because of one bad act? No, because acts and fruits are not the same thing. The fruit is the consequence of a whole series of the tree’s activities all working toward the same end, which is to reproduce the tree. In the instance before us, the Obama faction aims to transform the constitutionally pro-life people of Kenya into a people constitutionally disposed to practice and tolerate the murder of their nascent offspring. Similarly, they used health care legislation to establish a so-called healthcare system that aims to transform pro-life individuals in the United States into people who collectively fund the murder of nascent children. They used Obama’s momentary glamour and popularity after his election to scandalize the Christian world with the spiritually murderous spectacle of a supposedly God-fearing institution like the University of Notre Dame consciously choosing to proclaim as honorable a leader well known to be a towering tree in the political orchard of the culture of death. Everywhere we look we see the Obama faction give rise to new trees like themselves, trees dropping fruits that add to the harvest of evil.

Judging by things that happened during the run up to the vote on the Obama faction’s health takeover legislation, there are still many self-styled followers of Christ pretending that it’s possible to cherry pick fruit from this great, bad tree. Sadly, they may be encouraged in error by leaders who insist that civility requires us to pretend that Obama’s henchmen are not bad at all. I saw a report just recently that had Sen. Tom Coburn (R, OK) at a town hall meeting insisting that Nancy Pelosi is “a nice person. She’s a nice person. Just because somebody disagrees with you doesn’t mean they’re not a good person.” Tom Coburn seems to be a good person. But shall I follow him or Jesus Christ? Nancy Pelosi’s activities aim to reproduce the Obama faction’s bad tree, of which she is herself an offspring. A bad tree cannot bear good fruit. People like Nancy Pelosi are the fruit of a bad tree. Therefore, they are bad trees. They may sometimes mimic the activity of good fruit, right down to the ripe and luscious sheen. But like the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, once taken in, their beguiling ways lead further into the valley of the shadow of death. Not so the ways of Christ. When will some self-styled Christians stop deluding themselves? When will others cease to be deluded by them?

Only when they truly follow the example of Jesus Christ. Where the full meaning of life (i.e., its spiritual essence) is concerned, Christ did not call the people he disagreed with good people. He called them hypocrites and vipers. He thereby called their veracity into question and warned against their deadly nature. Are we not called, by his example, to do likewise? Oh, I know. We must be winsome in our ways. But in being so we must never upturn the truth, lest we win some (gain the world,) and lose everything (the spiritual essence of our own life and the lives of others influenced by us.)

  • Plaxo Pulse
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. How to tell a bad tree
  2. A health care promise to believe in
  3. Forcible health care leaves no right at all
  4. When did Baby Jesus get the right to life?
  5. Kagan’s reflexive bias will disfigure the USSC’s impartial appearance

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Chiu Chun-Ling April 7, 2010 at 11:30 pm

A thoughtful and enlightening analysis of one of Christ’s currently underappreciated teachings.  Indeed, it is true that Christ harshly condemned wicked actions and even evil thoughts.  But His prophetic insight in the results of actions is what gave such condemnation substance and power.

We may not be able to match Christ’s ability to see what must come, but we can watch and must learn from what does come to pass.

Reply

Ken Peterson April 7, 2010 at 7:44 pm

“Obama faction’s characteristic political tactic- say what people want to hear, but do what is required by your own evil objectives.”

Obama is practiced at hiding things as directed by his guide book.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a
video comment.

Previous post:

Next post: