web analytics
≡ Menu

Restoring Representation- A Strategic Proposal-I

[Introductory Note: Whatever the activity involved, sound strategic thinking requires a clear view of the overall objective to be achieved, one that starts by taking account of the context and circumstances of action, including especially the nature of the obstacles that may be part of that account at any given time. The obstacles include, of course, those posed by “the enemy”, even when that word does not literally refer to one’s opponent in time of war. Making the objective the conditional premise of thought, we then proceed to lay out the actions required to achieve it, first taking stock of the relative distribution of means suitable for attaining, or thwarting the attainment, of the objective. Finally we think through and lay out the structure or plan of action in all its dimensions (the physical dimensions of time, space and available physical energy, including human resources in their purely material physical aspect; and the human dimension of morale, i.e., conscience and spiritedness.) In light of these requirements this proposal for action by people determined to restore the politics of representation beginning with the 2012 election (hereafter referred to as “true republicans”) will be presented in three parts:

I. The context and circumstances of action, detailing the present crisis of representative government in the United States;

II. The means of action, (beginning with a description of the strategic objective of electoral action by true republicans in the 2012 general election);

III. The plan of action]


Part I

The Crisis of Representation

During the general election in 2008 the GOP’s sitting President responded to the financial equivalent of Pearl Harbor by openly surrendering to socialism. Then the GOP elitists’ carefully engineered nominee for President abandoned and disheartened the voters the Party is supposed to represent when he contemptuously refused to voice their opposition to that surrender. When John McCain refused to represent the large majority of Americans who rejected G. W. Bush’s TARP bank bailout, he effectively threw the election to Obama. The GOP and the Democrats are supposed to be opposing teams. But, in fact the same elitist conglomerate owns them both. The GOP quarterback’s intentionally thrown interception pass made this obvious to anyone willing to see.

So has behavior of the GOP’s leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives since the 2008 result. On issues of constitutional moral principle; on budget matters; and even on issues like border security, illegal immigration and education they have stubbornly refused to represent the priorities of the Tea Party constituency whose vote restored the House of Representatives to GOP control. Worse still they have positively aided and abetted the Obama faction’s contemptuous subversion of the U.S. Constitution. Moreover, in many place GOP leaders at the state level have made little or no effort to hide their determination to thwart and excise Tea Party influence, up to and including efforts to redraw election districts to defeat Tea Party incumbents.

Obviously, the coaching staffs of both the so-called major political parties answer to owners who made or enhanced their fortunes by betting on the political games; who hedge their bets by fixing the games; and who have been paying themselves off by raping the public income, and destroying the good faith and credit of the American people. So despite the people’s reaction against them, their stranglehold has gotten far more explicit and deadly under Obama, largely because the GOP’s theatrically feigned reluctance is just that: a thoroughly scripted, lavishly staged, badly acted performance.

Obama and his cohorts pursue left wing socialist (communist) goals with right wing socialist (Nazi/Fascist) tactics. His good sounding prologue won them some rhetorical applause before the curtain went up. But by now their hardline socialist predilections have become undeniably evident. As I and others like me predicted, many Americans have recoiled from their crudely aggressive push to socialism. Like people poisoned with bad fish, they are nauseated. Their nausea urgently impels them to find the appropriate facility for emptying their collective political stomach, before the fishy meal puts them out of their misery. If the GOP were anything like the conservative alternative it pretends to be, its leaders would have worked to make sure the November election provided people with the a good, clean rest stop with facilities suitable for the purpose. They would also have taken pains to reassure people that the GOP’s food preparation process includes none of the fishy stuff that has so painfully disagreed with them.

Instead, the GOP’s crypto-socialist elite engineered a primary process dank with the stinking fog of fishy manipulation. It included: a primary in Virginia with ballot access so clumsily rigged that only one candidate made it through to face their favorite; results from other States that were skewed by misleading reports and/or blatant lies put out to create a false impression of their favorite’s momentum; and a media blitz intended to foment a phony presumption of victory that would stampede the vote at a time when States that had, respectively, the largest blocks of delegates at stake had yet to go to the polls.

So the nominee of their presumption, the not-so-closet socialist Willard Mitt Romney, has become the GOP’s “presumptive nominee.” His record shows that in every relevant test for socialist tendencies he shows up with the same harmful characteristics as his opponent (sometimes more definitively so, as for example, the institution of socialist health care while he was Governor of Massachusetts, complete with government mandated insurance purchases and government funded abortions.) To be sure, Romney’s socialism flopped onto the deck of the ship of State a bit earlier than Obama’s. But spending more time at sea to camouflage his origins, he is now being delivered to the nation with the same rotten catches as his opponent.

Romney’s presumptuous nomination constitutes the conclusive proof that the so called two-party system is an electoral façade. It puts on a false show of consent to legitimize what is otherwise the self-selection process of an elitist leadership that has rejected the republican vision of America’s founders. In this false show of consent people get to “pick” a winner, but only in the sense that successful bettors do as they follow the horses at a race track. No matter what the majority decides, the outcome of the race isn’t decided by their choice. Insofar as human will determines the outcome, the people who own, train and ride the horses have the say, not the people who “back” the winner with their bets.

Pathetically, by accepting this kind of election Americans end up picking “winners” who have in fact already been foreordained by the choice of others. By the time they get to the race track on any given election day, the available field has been set without their participation. Of course instead of trainers and riders the owners prepare the candidates they have entered into the race with the help of media bobbleheads and political handlers, nourish them with generous bushels of money, and build their credibility with carefully timed and fabricated oddsmakers, otherwise billed as pollsters.

Viability is the concept that translates all this into pricks and goads intended to herd voters toward the betting windows (voting places). Media coverage and money are the chief components of viability. Since both are controlled by elements of the elite faction, this means that no one can be recognized as part of the field without their backing. Having thus determined the choices, the elitists have determined the choice, since no one they have not vetted will be perceived by voters as available to be chosen.

This way of rounding up people to participate in their political theatricals has worked especially well in the opening scenes of the partisan electoral show, the caucuses and primaries. It has its counterpart, however, in the general election, since ballot access in many States is far easier for so-called “publicly recognized” candidates (i.e., those favored with attention from the elite controlled media and money powers) than for others. The “publicly recognized” candidates can often avoid the petition drives and fees imposed on “ordinary” folks (however extraordinary they may be) who commit the offense of exercising their citizen rights without elitist approval.

This way of “disappearing” some candidates unacceptable to the elitist faction, while keeping others off the ballot altogether, produces elections that offer no more real choice than the electoral puppet shows engineered by the Communist Party in the Old Soviet Union. Voters become the passive consumers of political choices made to suit the dictates of the elite faction. Of course in politics, a choice of candidates dictated by elitist forces results in office holders whose actions represent the priorities and interests of the forces that dictated the available choices, not the people who ostensibly voted one of them into office.

Thanks to this elitist dictation, American politics now involves elections in which the people get no real choice. But where there is no real choice, there is no real election. Where there is no real election, there is no true representation. And where there is no true representation there is no consent of the governed. But according to America’s founding principles, the just powers of government are derived from the consent of the governed. So without true representation, there are no just powers of government.

In Federalist #51, James Madison rightly declares that justice is the end of government. In its preamble, the U.S. Constitution gives that aim almost the first priority, excepting only civil union. But civil union will always be threatened when unjust powers run rampant in the name of government, for then its name is invoked to defeat its purpose, which is to secure the unalienable rights which the justice of the Creator makes available to all.

It has been said that politics is war by other means. However limited the truth of that observation, there is no doubt that it is far preferable to secure justice without war, than to achieve it at such terrible cost. America’s founders framed the constitutional government of the United States to respect that rational preference. But as long as the American people continue to allow a presumptuous elite to usurp the initiative that determines the choices available for their vote, the process of representation that made it possible to perpetuate their self-government will be undone. The just exercise of government power will be banished. The loss of union, liberty and peace will be inevitable. In political terms, therefore, the American people face no greater or more urgent political challenge than to reclaim the initiative of choice on which the restoration of their true representation in their country’s government depends, at every level.

[Check back soon for Part II: The means of action]

Series NavigationDemagoguery vs. Representation
{ 11 comments… add one }
  • Bjones36 May 29, 2012, 2:59 pm

    Alan, Thank you for your perserverance in exposing the current tyranny displayed by those who would destroy the God-ordained structure of our Constitution. We must indeed stand strong in the face of factionalized government and re-establish true government of, by  and for the people as the founding fathers intended

  • Donelle M. May 19, 2012, 7:54 pm

    Great article!  I have shared this with everyone I know.

  • sjdixierose May 18, 2012, 3:07 pm

    Wow. Alan this is one of the most jaw dropping impressive  articles I have ever read. You have stated the truth absolutely!  

  • Shuttlehall May 17, 2012, 6:23 pm

    Man proposes, GOD disposes. ..”As it was in the times of Noah…..”

  • Lsalan May 15, 2012, 4:09 pm

    Thank you, Alan, for summing this sad state of affairs up so well. Too many US citizens have settled for medicority and the whittling away of our freedoms (especially to elect representative leaders) for far too long. I wait in prayerful anticipation of your solution. God bless you and keep you.  

  • Michael Sriver May 11, 2012, 7:09 am

    I will Alan, and by God’s will, continue unto
    your closing remarks. At that time, and by His help, I trust myself, or anyone
    reading the text will offer a solid confirm, or humble critique.

  • sha44ss May 10, 2012, 11:23 pm

    There is a Deafening Silence out there Alan as your words above are being realized by so many of us!  We the People have been betrayed!   I sit here in profound distress to the plight of our nation and look forward to assurance in The means of Action.   I shall share this with as many people as I can and Pray that God spare us and deliver our children from our transgression.

  • talonspoint May 6, 2012, 9:35 pm
  • Fred August 13, 2010, 4:30 pm

    Keep up the good work Dr. Keyes. Are you going to Glenn Beck’s August 28th. meeting on the mall in DC? Hope to see you!

  • Chiu Chun-Ling August 12, 2010, 6:37 am

    There is something deeply sinister in the displacement of basic principles of justice by bureaucratic procedure as a decisive factor in the “legality” of government. More to be feared than the brutish murderer who at least confronts me in person is the pallid manipulator of printed forms who consigns me to death without the least tangible awareness that any violence has been done except to a bit of paper (if even that).

    God is not so easily deceived.

  • Dawg em August 11, 2010, 5:54 pm

    See, this is the problem in a nutshell; the complete dissolution, politically and practically, of respect for the natural law. And one might say it (the disrespect shown the constitutional parameters by which we are to live) is the consequence of this belief in a living document. The ideals are alive in so far as they respect the Creator God from whence they came. They soon atrophe and die when placed within the machinations of arrogant humans.
    Of course, this is only logical. Today we have a society that accepts the notion that in order to exercise our right to free speech we must get a license from our overlords. By means of this licensing process the tyrants use the color of law to threaten the “pulling” of said license should the licensee step outside what the government deems as acceptable. Certainly there is a societal need to ensure my boadcast does not overwhelm yours or anyone elses. Certainly a “patent” type of formulation would permit an owner of a bandwidth to be free so long as he does not ‘trespass’ on anothers’ rights.
    Likewise, giving beaurocrats veto power over our right to travel is equally nonsensical. Imagine a time in the old west where a cowpoke goes to town for some R&R, gets drunk and, while racing his steed out of town, accidently runs over and injures a pedestrian. Now imagine a judge or sheriff telling him it is a privalege to ride a horse. Nonsense.
    What does this have to do with the issue at hand? Simply put, we have degenerated as a society to the point where common sense, the natural law (and our attendant rights) and the constitution have been grossly distorted or wholly ignored. Enough so that the only limits we recognize are the ones our masters set for us. Not coincidentally, they see no restrictions that need be applied to them. Afterall, they’ve been setting the rules for some time and any restrictions on them would restrict their progressive thinking.
    Republican Rep. Bilbray is the poster boy for those who are accessories to the crime of treason that is prevalent among the oligarchs and elite. It would be too kind to simply say they are ignorant. Besides, I’ve heard it said ignorance of the law is no excuse.
    Convening grand juries is not, should not, be out of the question.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Copyright Regulations

All original material on Loyal To Liberty is copyrighted and you will need to observe these regulations when you plan to distribute or use content from this blog. Copyright Regulations for Content on Loyal To Liberty You are free to share, distribute or transmit any work on this blog under the following conditions: * Attribution: You must attribute any content you use to Loyal To Liberty by including a link back to the specific content page. You must not suggest that Loyal To Liberty endorses you or your use of the content on this blog. Even with attribution, you do not have permission to republish the entire blog post on a website. Only excerpts of less than 500 words from each blog post may be published on other websites. A link back to the specific blog post must be included. * Noncommercial Usage: You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless authorized to do so by Alan Keyes. * Derivative Works:Within the limits heretofore specified, you may build upon the contents of Loyal To Liberty as long as proper attribution (see above) is made. If you want to syndicate or distribute the full blog post on your website, permission must be obtained before you do so. For permission, please email alan@loyaltoliberty.com.
%d bloggers like this: