web analytics
≡ Menu

Secessionist or Federalist- which reclaims the Providential wisdom of America’s founding?

The Christian Federalist #3

Among those still enthralled by the GOP I guess that a majority would say they still respect America’s Revolutionary founders.  And among those who do, some would even profess to adhere to the principles of the Revolution the founders made.  Of course that Revolution was not completed when the the representatives of the people in their respective states moved to declare their independence on July 2, 1776.  Nor was it completed once they had supported the declaration made on July 4th  by successful battle.  But the aim they fought for was provisionally achieved once they united to ordain and establish the Constitution of  a general government that respected the Revolution’s principles.

I frequently consult the famous articles on the Constitution produced by some of the American Revolutionaries as part of the effort to persuade the people of the respective states to ratify the Constitution. In its compiled and edited form their commentary has come to be known as “The Federalist”.  In Federalist 10 Madison wrote: “In the extent and proper structure of the Union, therefore, we behold a republican remedy for the diseases most incident to republican government.  And according to the degree of pleasure and pride we feel in being republicans, ought to be our zeal in cherishing the spirit and supporting the character of Federalists.”

Obama’s re-election, and his immediate moves to purge and chasten the leadership of America’s armed forces, make it clear that the elitist faction is implacably determined completely to overturn (by force if necessary) the republican form of government established by America’s founders.   There are signs that many people loyal to that form of government, and determined to restore and preserve the liberty it exists to secure, are firmly resolved to resist its overthrow.

Not coincidentally, in recent days some attention has been focused on what is supposedly one manifestation of this resolve- an apparently coordinated effort in which people, supposedly upset about Obama’s re-election,  are asked to sign petitions demanding that he approve their State’s immediate secession from the Union.

I  caution people against being caught up in this sudden effort to dissolve the union (especially since it acts on the specious notion that the Executive Branch of the U.S. government is in some way unilaterally empowered to permit or forbid secession.)  Why do I  say that this supposed ‘secession movement’ is no coincidence? Because it is actually consistent with the elitist faction’s ongoing manipulation of the U.S. political process in ways aimed at destroying America’s key sources of strength.  I wrote about this back in April of 2009,  in one of the earliest postings on this blog (Real Change- Rejecting the Politics of Submission):

At the moment, this imaginary political process appears to serve the goal of establishing a system of global governance that will ultimately eliminate the need for the charade of representative institutions (or at least make it entirely optional.) From the oligarchic point of view, the advantage of such a global system lies in the concentration of sufficient power in the hands of a global elite to deter, co-opt or suppress opposition. This requires that a background network of globally minded elites becomes, in effect, the last remaining superpower, with no lesser power capable of standing alone against it. The American union has the wherewithal to be a lasting superpower, but on a national basis incompatible with the globalist principle of the New World Order. Therefore, the continued existence of the United States is an obstacle which must be removed by reducing the power and destroying the unity of the nation.

The Revolutionary advocates of the U.S. Constitution identified “the extent and proper structure of the Union” as the key to assuring that the American experience with republican self-government would not be as untenable and short-lived as all those that had come before it.  Unless they simply reject, or are ignorant of, the Framers’ prudential judgment, it’s impossible to understand why Americans who claim that they want to preserve republican liberty would be drawn into a movement aimed at destroying the Union.

In the famous words of  his most famous peroration, Daniel Webster spoke from the heart of American statesmanship when he exclaimed “Liberty and Union; now and forever; one and inseparable!”  In a profound sense, Lincoln’s appreciation for the interdependence of these elements of America’s identity was the bedrock foundation for his conduct of the nation’s affairs during the Civil War.  Together with Christian faith and faithful reason, liberty and union are, as it were, the four points at the base of the pyramid depicted in the Great Seal of the United States.  That pyramid rises toward the all-seeing Eye, wherewith God makes certain of His providence for America’s cause.

Now, and for some years to come, America’s providential mission as a bastion of hope for the survival of God-endowed human liberty faces the greatest challenge in its history.  If it is to survive, we will have to remember and properly apply the singular but multifaceted wisdom that was, without doubt, the most important gift God bestowed upon the nation’s birth.  For Madison and others like him who championed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, the term “federalist” epitomized the application of that wisdom to America’s government and politics. These days do we have any idea what that term meant to them; or what it should mean to us? Perhaps it is time for us to reclaim what Madison said he and his compatriots felt on account of their “pleasure and pride… in being republicans,…” Do we mean truly to pursue the effort to restore and preserve America’s liberty? If so, then perhaps it is time for us to recapture the founders’ revolutionary “zeal in cherishing the spirit and supporting the character of Federalists.”

Series NavigationA God-acknowledging party- if we strive to build it, will you come?Union under God, but not against His law
StumbleUponLinkedInFacebookDeliciousRedditDiggEvernoteTwitterTumblrShare
{ 5 comments }

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • RosencrantzUndGuildenstern

    Ironically, Mr Keyes, perhaps the most pertinent statement you’ve made in the above article is that which you’ve placed in a bracketed parenthesis; To wit, that these petitions to the WH to secede makes a mockery of what is a near-sacred act/right of the people and/or states. And they do so, as you intimate (in parenthesis) by acting “on the specious notion that the Executive Branch of the U.S. government is in some way unilaterally empowered to permit or forbid secession.”

    Thinking conservatives like yourself need to do as you have done and cease being comfortable under their status as the ‘silent majority’; speak out NOW; and end this frustrating disorganization, imprudence and persistent trepidation of their fellow patriots (which only sees us constantly being manipulated, misinformed and co-opted for the sake of foolish causes and towards depressingly-inane ends like this new move for secession).

    God bless you Mr Keyes.

    • alkeyes

      Thanks for you apt comment. In the article I’ve just written as this week’s WND column I deal in greater detail with the issue I allude to in parentheses in this post. Keep an eye out for it.

      Godspeed,
      Alan Keyes

  • Jared

    As always, glad I came to your site to see your thoughts on the matter. I hadn’t considered before that, if people petition Obama for leave to create a new government peacefully, apart from just being impractical, it may play into the hands of those who want to make the internet a tool to destroy the United States. Though I am excited there are people willing to express a disgust for the status quo.

  • VR

    Illuminating as always Dr. Keyes. Your insight on the NWO elites puts a new perspective on this issue. You couldn’t be more right about whose purpose the fracturing of the union would ultimately serve. Yet, the will to independence and respect for the constitution is obviously alive and well in the minds of secessionists and their supporters. What is the most practical way to capitalize on this while preserving unity, and organize going forward? Shouldn’t we tap into this vast pool of individuals as potential third-party members? Through social media we can consider our options, attempt to educate others, and harness this spirit and energy!

    • givelifeachance2

      Agree that Keyes’ eloquence and reason needs to attract its own following -- let those “brave” signers of the WH petition sign up to follow Keyes and we would be on our way out of this mess.

Copyright Regulations

All original material on Loyal To Liberty is copyrighted and you will need to observe these regulations when you plan to distribute or use content from this blog. Copyright Regulations for Content on Loyal To Liberty You are free to share, distribute or transmit any work on this blog under the following conditions: * Attribution. You must attribute any content you use to Loyal To Liberty by including a link back to the specific content page. You must not suggest that Loyal To Liberty endorses you or your use of the content on this blog. Even with attribution, you do not have permission to republish the entire blog post on a website. Only excerpts of less than 100 words from each blog post may be published on other websites. A link back to the specific blog post must be included. * Noncommercial Usage. You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless authorized to do so by Alan Keyes. * Derivative Works. Within the limits heretofore specified, you may build upon the contents of Loyal To Liberty as long as proper attribution (see above) is made. If you want to syndicate or distribute the full blog post on your website, permission must be obtained before you do so. For permission, please email alan@loyaltoliberty.com.
%d bloggers like this: