web analytics
≡ Menu

The GOP’s Romney imperative: Hate the socialist, love the socialism?

Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. (James Madison, 1822)

Where there is no prophetic vision the people cast off restraint,… (Proverbs 29:18)

Anyone who shares his thinking should expect people to disagree with it.  My experience with this blog definitely verifies that expectation.  My readership here mainly (though not exclusively) consists of people who think of themselves as conservatives. However, they’re understanding of the term isn’t always congruent with mine.  From the first, reader response to my articles reflected this. People have not hesitated to reject what I have to say.

That’s as it should be. I’ve been impressed, though, that by and large my readers couched their disagreement in reasonable terms, relying on facts and reasoning, or a different view of the principles, precepts and priorities than mine.

To be sure, there was the occasional fitful outburst: the dismissive epithet; the off-color exclamation; the attempt to discourage or intimidate with ad hominem put-downs, name-calling and the like.  More often than not, however, the little substance one could glimpse in such dross clearly marked the purveyor as a leftist, one of the executioners of history who wander to and fro in the blogosphere looking for opportunities to inflict its judgments.  People like this prefer pungent, four-letter words precisely calculated to drive people with a sense of decency from the field.

In recent months, though, I’ve been hearing from people who insist that they are conservatives, Republicans, even once-upon-a-time political supporters.   Yet their comments and emails have all the hallmarks my experience leads me to associate with the Alinsky-leftist outriders of “history.”  They are full of reeking epithets and ad-hominem verbal punches. (Given the socialist cast of Romney’s career, I suspect that these people reflect his growing impact on the GOP’s political culture.)

Such reasoning as they contain is of the circle-the-wagons variety, except they don’t bother to target any of the arguments I offer against the position their circular reasoning defends: ’Because of the socialist plans Obama is trying to implement, we must vote him out; despite the socialist plans Romney has implemented, we must vote him in.’  Apparently they have adopted a dyslexic political version of  the familiar mantra some claim to be a Biblical directive:  Hate the socialist but love the socialism.  My sin is that I will not accept this self-devouring illogic.  I believe that many of the people who are accepting it do so because they are overwhelmed with fear, which leads them to run in panic toward the very thing they claim to hate.  They are like drowning swimmers lashing out against the lifeline of common sense that still might rescue them.

I have heard that rescue workers are taught how to deal with this panic so as to avoid their own destruction.  I wish I had the benefit of some such instruction as I deal with its political form.  Except I share the thinking that allows me to see the danger, what lifeline can I offer to those I see drowning in ignorance, lies and delusion?  But because I will not stop doing so, I am losing home and livelihood and all, under the assault calculated to cut-off what had been my lifeline of support from like-minded companions of God and liberty.

Faced with this dilemma, I thank God that I never fell prey to the inhuman hubris of Ayn Rand’s philosophy.  “For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth…” (Job 19:25)   Then, as Ezekiel warns, those who feed off the fruit of the poisoned trees of God opposing largess will find that “they cast their silver into the streets, and their gold is like an unclean thing.  Their silver and gold are not able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the Lord.  They cannot satisfy their hunger or fill their stomachs with it.  For it was the stumbling block of their iniquity.” ( Ezekiel 7:19)

Meanwhile I will persevere in the hope that, with a dose of the right knowledge, the American people will return to self-government; and to the God acknowledging moral principles on which it depends.

{ 8 comments… add one }
  • marcifranseen August 29, 2012, 1:57 pm

    What do we do now concerning the upcoming election?

  • JohnOfPhiladelphia August 24, 2012, 9:53 am

    That Alan’s blog offers no hope is a spurious claim. If you had been paying attention, Alan has in the very recent past posted a three-part piece concerning what he believes is the solution to the two-party sham that America currently faces. A few clicks in the archives on this site should reveal them to you.

    But that aside, how can a solution be gained if Americans do not wish to admit the problem. The two party system is just part of the problem but a very big part. And to say that looking at this problem and taking it at face value is not an option means you are not interested in any true solution whatsoever!

    Only ostriches do what you seem to be advocating! Alan is no ostrich. Certainly the GOPE machine is no way to the HOPE you speak of!

  • JohnOfPhiladelphia August 24, 2012, 9:40 am

    May the Lord keep you and yours Mr Keyes.

    Though I cannot fathom your insistent alleigance to Catholicism, being Protestant myself, I acknowledge you as a man of integrity and great moral fortitude, A man I am happy to fight for America’s right to self-governance side by side with.

    I pray that many others listen and are awakened to your words before it is too late. Alas, I often consider that it is too late.

  • disqus_smWiOrvPtd August 22, 2012, 7:32 pm

    “Black is black and white is white. Neither torture, maltreatment nor intimidation can change a fact. To argue the point… serves no useful purpose.” P.O.W. Major David F. MacGhee responding to brainwashing attempts by the North Korean , January 19th, 1953.

  • Wylie Wolf August 20, 2012, 12:02 pm

    Let each
    citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a
    present or a compliment to please an individual – or at least that he ought not
    so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human
    society for which he is accountable to God and his country. Samuel Adams

  • Jerry Laird August 19, 2012, 6:26 pm

    Dear Mr. Keyes – I think much of the reaction to your Romney = Socialist blog was that people didn’t feel that you left them an “out”.
    In a highly emotional drama such as this campaign is, it’s hard for the average person to suddenly find out there are two (not one) villains on the stage, and Polly is still tied to the railroad track.
    Suggesting that the two-party system should be revisited is just not a solution to Polly’s dilemma.
    Perhaps I’m wrong, but people really are looking for solutions – and this blog left them feeling – well, I said it – “hope”-less.
    Best regards to a great American,
    Jerry Laird

  • God Bless America August 19, 2012, 12:14 pm

    I was proud to have voted for Alan Keyes for president in 2008. An American who loves our country,and is not “weak kneed” to declare that love.

  • Jim August 18, 2012, 2:18 pm

    Unless the Lord builds the house, they labor in vain who build it.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Copyright Regulations

All original material on Loyal To Liberty is copyrighted and you will need to observe these regulations when you plan to distribute or use content from this blog. Copyright Regulations for Content on Loyal To Liberty You are free to share, distribute or transmit any work on this blog under the following conditions: * Attribution: You must attribute any content you use to Loyal To Liberty by including a link back to the specific content page. You must not suggest that Loyal To Liberty endorses you or your use of the content on this blog. Even with attribution, you do not have permission to republish the entire blog post on a website. Only excerpts of less than 500 words from each blog post may be published on other websites. A link back to the specific blog post must be included. * Noncommercial Usage: You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless authorized to do so by Alan Keyes. * Derivative Works:Within the limits heretofore specified, you may build upon the contents of Loyal To Liberty as long as proper attribution (see above) is made. If you want to syndicate or distribute the full blog post on your website, permission must be obtained before you do so. For permission, please email alan@loyaltoliberty.com.
%d bloggers like this: